<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ns1:descriptiveReport xmlns:ns1="http://Pydro.com/2013/01/DescriptiveReport" xmlns:ns2="http://Pydro.com/2013/01/AllGlobalTypes" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><ns1:metadata><ns1:projectMetadata><ns2:number>S-B935-TJ-12</ns2:number><ns2:name>NY Harbor and Vicinity Respons</ns2:name><ns2:generalLocality>NY Harbor and Vicinity</ns2:generalLocality><ns2:fieldUnit>NOAA Ship THOMAS JEFFERSON</ns2:fieldUnit></ns1:projectMetadata><ns1:registryMetadata><ns2:registryNumber>F00626</ns2:registryNumber><ns2:sheetID>1</ns2:sheetID><ns2:registryInstructions xsi:nil="true"></ns2:registryInstructions><ns2:sublocality>NY Harbor and Vicinity</ns2:sublocality><ns2:stateOrTerritory>New York</ns2:stateOrTerritory><ns2:country>United States</ns2:country><ns2:scale>10000</ns2:scale></ns1:registryMetadata><ns1:surveyMetadata><ns2:year>2012</ns2:year><ns2:chiefOfParty>CDR Lawrence T. Krepp</ns2:chiefOfParty><ns2:projectType>Natural Disaster Response</ns2:projectType><ns2:PIDate>2012-11-01</ns2:PIDate><ns2:datesOfSurvey><ns2:start>2012-11-01</ns2:start><ns2:end>2012-11-03</ns2:end></ns2:datesOfSurvey><ns2:equipmentTypes><ns2:soundingEquipment>Multibeam Echo Sounder</ns2:soundingEquipment><ns2:imageryEquipment>Side Scan Sonar</ns2:imageryEquipment><ns2:imageryEquipment>Multibeam Echo Sounder Backscatter</ns2:imageryEquipment></ns2:equipmentTypes><ns2:acquisition><ns2:units>meters</ns2:units></ns2:acquisition><ns2:horizontalCoordinateSystem zone="18N">Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) NAD83</ns2:horizontalCoordinateSystem><ns2:timeZone>UTC</ns2:timeZone><ns2:verifier>Atlantic Hydrographic Branch</ns2:verifier><ns2:titlesheetRemarks><ns2:fieldRemarks xsi:nil="true"></ns2:fieldRemarks><ns2:branchRemarks xsi:nil="true"></ns2:branchRemarks></ns2:titlesheetRemarks></ns1:surveyMetadata><ns1:assignment>NOAA</ns1:assignment></ns1:metadata><ns1:areaSurveyed><ns1:areaDescription><ns2:discussion>Areas were surveyed based upon USCG requests and HSD tasking.</ns2:discussion><ns2:limits><ns2:northWest><ns2:latitude hemisphere="N">40.8056</ns2:latitude><ns2:longitude hemisphere="W">73.8945</ns2:longitude></ns2:northWest><ns2:southEast><ns2:latitude hemisphere="N">40.4764</ns2:latitude><ns2:longitude hemisphere="W">74.0697</ns2:longitude></ns2:southEast></ns2:limits><ns2:comments/></ns1:areaDescription><ns1:surveyPurpose><ns2:discussion>In response to Hurricane Sandy and the subsequent closure of New York harbor and approaches, the USCG has requested the NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson for survey support.</ns2:discussion><ns2:comments/></ns1:surveyPurpose><ns1:surveyQuality><ns2:adequacy>The survey is NOT adequate to supersede previous data.</ns2:adequacy><ns2:discussion>Crosslines were not acquired over the MBES data.  Also, data were reduced to MLLW using observed tides and one tide station (Sandy Hook, NJ) was not functional at the time of survey.</ns2:discussion><ns2:comments><ns2:branchComment concurrence="Do not concur"><ns2:comment>SAR: Verified TCARI tides were applied to the data during office processing. </ns2:comment></ns2:branchComment></ns2:comments></ns1:surveyQuality><ns1:surveyLimits><ns2:results deviation="false"><ns2:discussion>Survey Limits were acquired in accordance with the requirements in the Project Instructions and the HSSD.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:surveyLimits><ns1:coverageGraphic><ns2:figureNumber>1</ns2:figureNumber><ns2:caption>Coverage Graphic for F00626</ns2:caption><ns2:link>file:///V:/F00626_B935_TJ_12/AHB_F00626/Reports/DR/Report_Body/Images/F00626_Survey_Limits.jpg</ns2:link></ns1:coverageGraphic><ns1:surveyCoverage><ns2:results deviation="false"><ns2:discussion>Survey Coverage was in accordance with the requirements in the Project Instructions and the HSSD.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments><ns2:branchComment concurrence="Do not concur"><ns2:comment>SAR: There were deviations from the survey coverage requirements as required in the Project Instructions. In some areas the field did not achieve 200% side scan coverage with set line multibeam. Object detection multibeam coverage was not obtained by the field. </ns2:comment></ns2:branchComment></ns2:comments></ns1:surveyCoverage><ns1:surveyStatistics><ns2:surveyDates>2012-11-01</ns2:surveyDates><ns2:surveyDates>2012-11-02</ns2:surveyDates><ns2:surveyDates>2012-11-03</ns2:surveyDates><ns2:totalSurveyStats><ns2:bottomSamples>0</ns2:bottomSamples><ns2:AWOIS>0</ns2:AWOIS><ns2:maritimeBoundaryPoints>0</ns2:maritimeBoundaryPoints><ns2:DP>0</ns2:DP><ns2:diveOps>0</ns2:diveOps><ns2:SNM>14.72</ns2:SNM></ns2:totalSurveyStats><ns2:LNM><ns2:vesselLNM><ns2:vessel><ns2:hullID>S222</ns2:hullID><ns2:statistics><ns2:MS_SBES>0</ns2:MS_SBES><ns2:MS_MBES>0</ns2:MS_MBES><ns2:MS_lidar>0</ns2:MS_lidar><ns2:MS_SSS>0</ns2:MS_SSS><ns2:MS_SBES_MBES>0</ns2:MS_SBES_MBES><ns2:MS_MBES_SSS>74.76</ns2:MS_MBES_SSS><ns2:MS_SBES_SSS>0</ns2:MS_SBES_SSS><ns2:XL_MBES_SBES>0</ns2:XL_MBES_SBES><ns2:XL_lidar>0</ns2:XL_lidar></ns2:statistics></ns2:vessel><ns2:vessel><ns2:hullID>3101</ns2:hullID><ns2:statistics><ns2:MS_SBES>0</ns2:MS_SBES><ns2:MS_MBES>0</ns2:MS_MBES><ns2:MS_lidar>0</ns2:MS_lidar><ns2:MS_SSS>0</ns2:MS_SSS><ns2:MS_SBES_MBES>0</ns2:MS_SBES_MBES><ns2:MS_MBES_SSS>65.06</ns2:MS_MBES_SSS><ns2:MS_SBES_SSS>0</ns2:MS_SBES_SSS><ns2:XL_MBES_SBES>0</ns2:XL_MBES_SBES><ns2:XL_lidar>0</ns2:XL_lidar></ns2:statistics></ns2:vessel><ns2:vessel><ns2:hullID>3102</ns2:hullID><ns2:statistics><ns2:MS_SBES>0</ns2:MS_SBES><ns2:MS_MBES>46.65</ns2:MS_MBES><ns2:MS_lidar>0</ns2:MS_lidar><ns2:MS_SSS>0</ns2:MS_SSS><ns2:MS_SBES_MBES>0</ns2:MS_SBES_MBES><ns2:MS_MBES_SSS>37.17</ns2:MS_MBES_SSS><ns2:MS_SBES_SSS>0</ns2:MS_SBES_SSS><ns2:XL_MBES_SBES>0</ns2:XL_MBES_SBES><ns2:XL_lidar>0</ns2:XL_lidar></ns2:statistics></ns2:vessel></ns2:vesselLNM><ns2:totalLNM><ns2:MS_SBES>0</ns2:MS_SBES><ns2:MS_MBES>46.65</ns2:MS_MBES><ns2:MS_lidar>0</ns2:MS_lidar><ns2:MS_SSS>0</ns2:MS_SSS><ns2:MS_SBES_MBES>0</ns2:MS_SBES_MBES><ns2:MS_MBES_SSS>176.99</ns2:MS_MBES_SSS><ns2:MS_SBES_SSS>0</ns2:MS_SBES_SSS><ns2:XL_MBES_SBES>0</ns2:XL_MBES_SBES><ns2:XL_lidar>0</ns2:XL_lidar><ns2:percentXLLNM>0</ns2:percentXLLNM></ns2:totalLNM></ns2:LNM><ns2:discussion xsi:nil="true"></ns2:discussion><ns2:comments/></ns1:surveyStatistics></ns1:areaSurveyed><ns1:dataAcquisitionAndProcessing><ns1:equipmentAndVessels><ns1:discussion>Refer to the Data Acquisition and Processing Report (DAPR) for a complete description of data acquisition and processing systems, survey vessels, quality control procedures and data processing methods.  Additional information to supplement sounding and survey data, and any deviations from the DAPR are discussed in the following sections.</ns1:discussion><ns1:vessels><ns1:vessel><ns2:hullID>S222</ns2:hullID><ns2:LOA units="feet">208</ns2:LOA><ns2:draft units="feet">14</ns2:draft></ns1:vessel><ns1:vessel><ns2:hullID>3101</ns2:hullID><ns2:LOA units="feet">31</ns2:LOA><ns2:draft units="feet">5.1</ns2:draft></ns1:vessel><ns1:vessel><ns2:hullID>3102</ns2:hullID><ns2:LOA units="feet">31</ns2:LOA><ns2:draft units="feet">5.1</ns2:draft></ns1:vessel><ns1:discussion xsi:nil="true"></ns1:discussion><ns1:comments/></ns1:vessels><ns1:equipment><ns1:majorSystem><ns2:manufacturer>Reson</ns2:manufacturer><ns2:model>7125 ROV</ns2:model><ns2:type>MBES</ns2:type></ns1:majorSystem><ns1:majorSystem><ns2:manufacturer>Reson</ns2:manufacturer><ns2:model>7125 SV1</ns2:model><ns2:type>MBES</ns2:type></ns1:majorSystem><ns1:majorSystem><ns2:manufacturer>Klein</ns2:manufacturer><ns2:model>5000</ns2:model><ns2:type>SSS</ns2:type></ns1:majorSystem><ns1:majorSystem><ns2:manufacturer>Applanix</ns2:manufacturer><ns2:model>POSMV v4</ns2:model><ns2:type>Positioning and Attitude System</ns2:type></ns1:majorSystem><ns1:majorSystem><ns2:manufacturer>Brooke Ocean</ns2:manufacturer><ns2:model>MVP 100</ns2:model><ns2:type>Sound Speed System</ns2:type></ns1:majorSystem><ns1:majorSystem><ns2:manufacturer>Seabird</ns2:manufacturer><ns2:model>Seacat 19+</ns2:model><ns2:type>Conductivity, Temperature and Depth Sensor</ns2:type></ns1:majorSystem><ns1:discussion xsi:nil="true"></ns1:discussion><ns1:comments/></ns1:equipment><ns1:comments/></ns1:equipmentAndVessels><ns1:qualityControl><ns1:crosslines><ns2:discussion>Crosslines were not acquired as this was an emergency response survey looking for specific items on the seafloor.</ns2:discussion><ns2:comments/></ns1:crosslines><ns1:uncertainty><ns2:values><ns2:tideUncertainty><ns2:measured units="meters">0</ns2:measured><ns2:zoning units="meters">0.105</ns2:zoning></ns2:tideUncertainty><ns2:soundSpeedUncertainty><ns2:hullID>S222</ns2:hullID><ns2:measuredCTD units="meters/second">N/A</ns2:measuredCTD><ns2:measuredMVP units="meters/second">1</ns2:measuredMVP><ns2:surface units="meters/second">0.2</ns2:surface></ns2:soundSpeedUncertainty><ns2:soundSpeedUncertainty><ns2:hullID>3101 &amp; 3102</ns2:hullID><ns2:measuredCTD units="meters/second">4</ns2:measuredCTD><ns2:measuredMVP units="meters/second">N/A</ns2:measuredMVP><ns2:surface units="meters/second">0.2</ns2:surface></ns2:soundSpeedUncertainty></ns2:values><ns2:discussion>CO-OPS provided a tidal error value of 0.21m which is at the 2 standard deviation level.  CARIS computes TPU based on 1 standard deviation.  Based on this, the value entered into CARIS was one-half the value provided by CO-OPS.</ns2:discussion><ns2:comments/></ns1:uncertainty><ns1:junctions><ns2:discussion>No comparisons were conducted as this was an emergency response survey.</ns2:discussion><ns2:comments/></ns1:junctions><ns1:sonarQCChecks><ns2:results deviation="true"><ns2:discussion>Crosslines were not conducted.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:sonarQCChecks><ns1:equipmentEffectiveness><ns2:results deviation="false"><ns2:issue><ns2:title>None Exist</ns2:title><ns2:discussion>There were no conditions or deficiencies that affected equipment operational effectiveness.</ns2:discussion><ns2:comments/></ns2:issue></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:equipmentEffectiveness><ns1:factorsAffectingSoundings><ns2:results deviation="true"><ns2:issue><ns2:title>Damaged Tidal Station</ns2:title><ns2:discussion>The tidal station at Sandy Hook, NJ was damaged by the hurricane and as a result was not functional during the dates of survey.  As a result, CO-OPS adjusted the tidal zoning.</ns2:discussion><ns2:comments><ns2:branchComment concurrence="Concur with clarification"><ns2:comment>SAR: Verified water levels did not have any outages. TCARI tides were applied during office processing. </ns2:comment></ns2:branchComment></ns2:comments></ns2:issue></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:factorsAffectingSoundings><ns1:soundSpeedMethods><ns1:castFrequency>Casts were conducted every 2-3 hours for 3101 and 3102 and every 20-30 minutes for S222.</ns1:castFrequency><ns1:discussion xsi:nil="true"></ns1:discussion><ns1:comments/></ns1:soundSpeedMethods><ns1:coverageEquipmentAndMethods><ns2:results deviation="false"><ns2:discussion>All equipment and survey methods were used as detailed in the DAPR.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:coverageEquipmentAndMethods><ns1:additionalQualityControl><ns2:comments/></ns1:additionalQualityControl></ns1:qualityControl><ns1:echoSoundingCorrections><ns1:corrections><ns2:results deviation="false"><ns2:discussion>All data reduction procedures conform to those detailed in the DAPR.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:corrections><ns1:calibrations><ns2:results deviation="false"><ns2:discussion>All sounding systems were calibrated as detailed in the DAPR.</ns2:discussion><ns2:calibration xsi:nil="true"/></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:calibrations><ns1:additionalIssues><ns2:comments/></ns1:additionalIssues></ns1:echoSoundingCorrections><ns1:backscatter><ns2:results acquired="true"><ns2:discussion>Backscatter was logged as a 7k file and submitted to the IOCM processing center and/or directly to NGDC, and is not included with the data submitted to the Branch.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:backscatter><ns1:dataProcessing><ns1:softwareUpdates><ns1:featureObjectCatalog>NOAA Profile Field v.5.2</ns1:featureObjectCatalog><ns1:discussion xsi:nil="true"></ns1:discussion><ns1:comments/></ns1:softwareUpdates><ns1:surfaces><ns1:surface><ns2:surfaceName>F00626_Mosaic_100_1m</ns2:surfaceName><ns2:surfaceType>SSS Mosaic</ns2:surfaceType><ns2:resolution units="meters">1</ns2:resolution><ns2:depthRange><ns2:min xsi:nil="true"/><ns2:max xsi:nil="true"/></ns2:depthRange><ns2:surfaceParameter>N/A</ns2:surfaceParameter><ns2:purpose>Object Detection</ns2:purpose></ns1:surface><ns1:surface><ns2:surfaceName>F00626_Mosaic_200_1m</ns2:surfaceName><ns2:surfaceType>SSS Mosaic</ns2:surfaceType><ns2:resolution units="meters">1</ns2:resolution><ns2:depthRange><ns2:min xsi:nil="true"/><ns2:max xsi:nil="true"/></ns2:depthRange><ns2:surfaceParameter>N/A</ns2:surfaceParameter><ns2:purpose>Object Detection</ns2:purpose></ns1:surface><ns1:surface><ns2:surfaceName>F00626_2m_CUBE_MLLW</ns2:surfaceName><ns2:surfaceType>CUBE</ns2:surfaceType><ns2:resolution units="meters">2</ns2:resolution><ns2:depthRange><ns2:min units="meters">2.53</ns2:min><ns2:max units="meters">36.82</ns2:max></ns2:depthRange><ns2:surfaceParameter>NOAA_2m</ns2:surfaceParameter><ns2:purpose>Complete MBES</ns2:purpose></ns1:surface><ns1:surface><ns2:surfaceName>F00626_50cm_CUBE_MLLW</ns2:surfaceName><ns2:surfaceType>CUBE</ns2:surfaceType><ns2:resolution units="centimeters">50</ns2:resolution><ns2:depthRange><ns2:min units="meters">1.78</ns2:min><ns2:max units="meters">39.45</ns2:max></ns2:depthRange><ns2:surfaceParameter>NOAA_0.5m</ns2:surfaceParameter><ns2:purpose>Object Detection</ns2:purpose></ns1:surface><ns1:discussion>BASE surfaces were not finalized as this was an emergency response survey.</ns1:discussion><ns1:comments><ns2:branchComment concurrence="Do not concur"><ns2:comment>SAR: Finalized surfaces were created during office review. Surface resolutions were altered to accurately represent the data submitted to the branch. </ns2:comment></ns2:branchComment></ns1:comments></ns1:surfaces><ns1:additionalDataProcessing><ns2:comments/></ns1:additionalDataProcessing></ns1:dataProcessing></ns1:dataAcquisitionAndProcessing><ns1:verticalAndHorizontalControl><ns1:discussion>Additional information discussing the vertical or horizontal control for this survey can be found in the accompanying HVCR.</ns1:discussion><ns1:verticalControl><ns2:verticalDatum>Mean Lower Low Water</ns2:verticalDatum><ns2:standard_or_ERZT used="true"><ns2:methodsUsed>Discrete Zoning</ns2:methodsUsed><ns2:tideStations><ns2:NWLONGauges><ns2:stationName>The Battery</ns2:stationName><ns2:stationID>8518750</ns2:stationID></ns2:NWLONGauges><ns2:NWLONGauges><ns2:stationName>Bergen Point West Reach</ns2:stationName><ns2:stationID>8519483</ns2:stationID></ns2:NWLONGauges></ns2:tideStations><ns2:correctorFiles><ns2:tideCorrectors><ns2:fileName>B935TJ12CORP.zdf</ns2:fileName><ns2:status>Preliminary</ns2:status></ns2:tideCorrectors></ns2:correctorFiles><ns2:finalTides><ns2:dateSubmitted>2012-11-06</ns2:dateSubmitted><ns2:dateReceived>2013-01-09</ns2:dateReceived></ns2:finalTides><ns2:discussion>A final TCARI grid was provided to us, however data were not re-processed as this was an emergency response survey.</ns2:discussion><ns2:comments><ns2:branchComment concurrence="Concur with clarification"><ns2:comment>SAR: During office processing final TCARI tides were applied using file F00626.tc.</ns2:comment></ns2:branchComment></ns2:comments></ns2:standard_or_ERZT><ns2:VDATUM_or_constantSep used="false"><ns2:discussion xsi:nil="true"></ns2:discussion><ns2:comments/></ns2:VDATUM_or_constantSep><ns2:comments/></ns1:verticalControl><ns1:horizontalControl><ns2:horizontalDatum>North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)</ns2:horizontalDatum><ns2:projection>18N</ns2:projection><ns2:PPK used="false" xsi:nil="true"/><ns2:PPP used="false" xsi:nil="true"/><ns2:RTK used="false" xsi:nil="true"/><ns2:DGPS used="true"><ns2:USCGStations><ns2:name>Sandy Hook, NJ</ns2:name></ns2:USCGStations><ns2:discussion xsi:nil="true"></ns2:discussion><ns2:comments/></ns2:DGPS><ns2:comments/></ns1:horizontalControl><ns1:additionalIssues><ns2:comments/></ns1:additionalIssues></ns1:verticalAndHorizontalControl><ns1:resultsAndRecommendations><ns1:chartComparison><ns1:methods><ns2:discussion xsi:nil="true"></ns2:discussion><ns2:comments/></ns1:methods><ns1:charts><ns2:comments><ns2:fieldComment><ns2:comment>Chart comparisons were not conducted as this was an emergency response survey.</ns2:comment><ns2:initials>WGW</ns2:initials></ns2:fieldComment></ns2:comments></ns1:charts><ns1:AWOISItems><ns2:results investigated="None Exist"><ns2:discussion>No AWOIS items exist for this survey.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:AWOISItems><ns1:maritimeBoundary><ns2:results investigated="None Exist"><ns2:discussion>No Maritime Boundary Points were assigned for this survey.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:maritimeBoundary><ns1:chartedFeatures><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Charted features exist for this survey, but were not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments><ns2:branchComment concurrence="Concur with clarification"><ns2:comment>SAR: Charted features were addressed during office processing. </ns2:comment></ns2:branchComment></ns2:comments></ns1:chartedFeatures><ns1:unchartedFeatures><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Uncharted features exist for this survey, but were not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:unchartedFeatures><ns1:DTONS><ns2:results reportSubmitted="true"><ns2:numberSubmitted>1</ns2:numberSubmitted><ns2:report><ns2:title>DTON Report 1</ns2:title><ns2:dateSubmitted>2012-11-03</ns2:dateSubmitted></ns2:report><ns2:discussion>Danger to Navigation Reports are included in Appendix I of this report.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:DTONS><ns1:shoalAndHazardousFeatures><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Shoals or potentially hazardous features exist for this survey, but were not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:shoalAndHazardousFeatures><ns1:channels><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Channels, designated anchorages, precautionary areas, safety fairways, traffic separation schemes, pilot boarding areas, and/or channel and range lines exist within the survey limits, but were not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:channels><ns1:bottomSamples><ns2:results investigated="None Exist"><ns2:discussion>No bottom samples were required for this survey.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:bottomSamples></ns1:chartComparison><ns1:additionalResults><ns1:shoreline><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Shoreline was assigned in the Hydrographic Survey Project Instructions or Statement of Work, but was not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments><ns2:branchComment concurrence="Do not concur"><ns2:comment>SAR: Shoreline was not assigned for this survey. </ns2:comment></ns2:branchComment></ns2:comments></ns1:shoreline><ns1:priorSurveys><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Prior survey comparisons exist for this survey, but were not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:priorSurveys><ns1:ATONS><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Aids to navigation (ATONs) exist for this survey, but were not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:ATONS><ns1:overheadFeatures><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Overhead features exist for this survey, but were not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:overheadFeatures><ns1:submarineFeatures><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Submarine features exist for this survey, but were not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:submarineFeatures><ns1:ferryRoutesAndTerminals><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Ferry routes and/or terminals exist for this survey, but were not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:ferryRoutesAndTerminals><ns1:platforms><ns2:results investigated="None Exist"><ns2:discussion>No platforms exist for this survey.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:platforms><ns1:significantFeatures><ns2:results investigated="Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion xsi:nil="true"></ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:significantFeatures><ns1:constructionOrDredging><ns2:results investigated="Exist - Not Investigated"><ns2:discussion>Present and/or planned construction or dredging exists within the survey limits, but was not investigated.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:constructionOrDredging><ns1:otherResults><ns2:comments/></ns1:otherResults><ns1:newSurveyRecommendation><ns2:results recommended="false"><ns2:discussion>No new surveys or further investigations are recommended for this area.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:newSurveyRecommendation><ns1:insetRecommendation><ns2:results recommended="false"><ns2:discussion>No new insets are recommended for this area.</ns2:discussion></ns2:results><ns2:comments/></ns1:insetRecommendation></ns1:additionalResults></ns1:resultsAndRecommendations><ns1:approvalSheet><ns1:statements><ns1:supervision>As Chief of Party, Field operations for this hydrographic survey were conducted under my direct supervision, with frequent personal checks of progress and adequacy. I have reviewed the attached survey data and reports.</ns1:supervision><ns1:approval>All field sheets, this Descriptive Report, and all accompanying records and data are approved. All records are forwarded for final review and processing to the Processing Branch.</ns1:approval><ns1:adequacyOfSurvey>The survey data meets or exceeds requirements as set forth in the NOS Hydrographic Surveys and Specifications Deliverables Manual, Field Procedures Manual, Standing and Letter Instructions, and all HSD Technical Directives. These data are adequate to supersede charted data in their common areas. This survey is complete and no additional work is required with the exception of deficiencies noted in the Descriptive Report.</ns1:adequacyOfSurvey><ns1:additionalInfo xsi:nil="true"></ns1:additionalInfo></ns1:statements><ns1:signingPersonnel><ns2:approverName>LT William G. Winner</ns2:approverName><ns2:approverTitle>Field Operations Officer</ns2:approverTitle><ns2:approvalDate>2013-03-22</ns2:approvalDate></ns1:signingPersonnel><ns1:signingPersonnel><ns2:approverName>CDR Lawrence T. Krepp</ns2:approverName><ns2:approverTitle>Commanding Officer</ns2:approverTitle><ns2:approvalDate>2013-03-22</ns2:approvalDate></ns1:signingPersonnel></ns1:approvalSheet></ns1:descriptiveReport>